Bernie Sanders was right: global warming causes terrorism...

I have made it a ritual to watch all the presidential debates. I like to stay informed. In a recent democratic debate Bernie Sanders claimed that climate change is directly related to terrorism. Yes, he said that:

Such an absurd idea is obviously false, yet so many still agreed with the idea. Somehow a little warmer climate makes an otherwise peaceful religious sect start beheading, drowning, and lighting innocent civilians on fire. Such a notion was laughable, until a former CIA director confirmed that it was true.

Yes, Bernie was right. In a way…

You see ISIS is one of the most well funded terrorist organizations. Where do they get their funding? That question has had a known answer for some time now. OIL:

“Everyone tacitly knows where said funding is coming from (as we have revealed in an ongoing series of posts "Meet The Man Who Funds ISIS: Bilal Erdogan, The Son Of Turkey's President", "How Turkey Exports ISIS Oil To The World: The Scientific Evidence" and "ISIS Oil Trade Full Frontal: "Raqqa's Rockefellers", Bilal Erdogan, KRG Crude, And The Israel Connection") few on the US-led Western Alliance have done anything to stop the hundreds of millions in oil sale proceeds from funding the world's best organized terrorist group.”

In fact, the only party that actually did something to halt ISIS' oil infrastructure was Russia, whose bombing raids of Islamic State oil routes may not only have contributed to the fatal attack by Turkey of the Russian Su-24 (as the curtailment of ISIS' oil flows led to a big hit in the funds collected by the biggest middleman in the region, Turkey, its president and his son, Bilal not to mention Israel which may have been actively buying ISIS oil over the past year) but prompted questions why the bombing campaign by the US-led alliance had been so woefully incapable of hitting ISIS where it truly hurts: its funding.”

So, ISIS has been growing and expanding due to the fact that the US will not halt the flow of ISIS oil to Turkey. ISIS terrorism is directly related to fossil fuels. Now Bernie’s words are making more sense.

In an interview on PBS' Charlie Rose on Tuesday, Rose pointed out that before the terrorist attacks in Paris, the U.S. had not bombed ISIS-controlled oil tankers, to which the former CIA deputy director Michael Morell responded that Barack Obama didn’t order the bombing of ISIS’s oil transportation infrastructure until recently because he was concerned about environmental damage.

Yes, he really said that:

“We didn’t go after oil wells, actually hitting oil wells that ISIS controls, because we didn’t want to do environmental damage, and we didn’t want to destroy that infrastructure.”

In other words, one can blame such recent outbreaks of deadly terrorist activity as the Paris bombings and the explosion of the Russian passenger airplane over Egypt's Sinai Peninsula on Obama's hard line stance to not pollute the atmosphere with the toxic aftermath of destroyed ISIS infrastructure.

If you don’t believe that this is possible, here is the clip:

So yes ISIS has gone unimpeded in its terror due to climate change. Obama detests CO2 so vehemently that he would rather see ISIS continue beheading and committing acts of terror in France, Syria, Iraq, and elsewhere than see a slight rise in atmospheric carbon dioxide. This is obviously not what was meant by Sanders’ words at the debate but his words were eerily prophetic.

Yes, Climate Change, or better Climate Change Hysteria, is directly related to the rise of the Islamic State terrorism. Bernie was right...